Church of No, Thanks Celebrating Personal Liberty since 2008

This blog post on our sister site, UrsusPacificus, Tells of a troubling aspect of the debate between rationalists and believers in "more traditional" religions.

Not only can not Christian apologists defend their own scriptures without "interpreting" them, they also can't seem to refute basic scientific concepts res ipsa loquitur; they need to "interpret" them as well.

Such special pleading should be rejected, irrespective of its source.